<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re back!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/</link>
	<description>Easy to use, high quality freeware</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>i installed vistaglazz in my computer but it didnt work....causing some problemz
please help me with that....how can it work properly plz tell me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i installed vistaglazz in my computer but it didnt work&#8230;.causing some problemz<br />
please help me with that&#8230;.how can it work properly plz tell me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>can the new version1.2 work with sp1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can the new version1.2 work with sp1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Fugate</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Fugate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>thabk you this works great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thabk you this works great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoody</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-985</guid>
		<description>go to forums for all the latest on this, I have posted a fix that should work for most</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go to forums for all the latest on this, I have posted a fix that should work for most</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoody</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-962</guid>
		<description>VistaGlass V1.2 didn't fix the reboot! Same problem as with 1.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VistaGlass V1.2 didn&#8217;t fix the reboot! Same problem as with 1.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcproman</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>pcproman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-881</guid>
		<description>I have a)) which is waiting for the release of SP2
Give release!

---
Russian Mafia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a)) which is waiting for the release of SP2<br />
Give release!</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Russian Mafia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoody</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-866</guid>
		<description>??? Anybody still alive out here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??? Anybody still alive out here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoody</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Well the "maybe" turned out to be a big "nope" but I should have realized that because there are too many other people with this problem whom don't use this tweak.

Sooooo back to what I said before, this thing needs to be "fixed"

L8R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the &#8220;maybe&#8221; turned out to be a big &#8220;nope&#8221; but I should have realized that because there are too many other people with this problem whom don&#8217;t use this tweak.</p>
<p>Sooooo back to what I said before, this thing needs to be &#8220;fixed&#8221;</p>
<p>L8R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoody</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Hmmm maybe it has something to do with using a windows 7 type style.


To use this style just copy and paste the Windows 7 folder to this location:

C:\Windows\Resources\Themes

Then just click on the Windows 7.msstyle and apply the style.

I used this windows 7 style tweak to make my Vista look like W7


but only maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm maybe it has something to do with using a windows 7 type style.</p>
<p>To use this style just copy and paste the Windows 7 folder to this location:</p>
<p>C:\Windows\Resources\Themes</p>
<p>Then just click on the Windows 7.msstyle and apply the style.</p>
<p>I used this windows 7 style tweak to make my Vista look like W7</p>
<p>but only maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoody</title>
		<link>http://www.codegazer.com/2009/04/16/were-back-2/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codegazer.com/?p=148#comment-860</guid>
		<description>man look homes, we need a "fix" for this "vista" one right now, I'm not concerned about any Win7 version right now, win 7 is still in rc state. I have it installed on a second system partition but it pretty much looks and works like my vista anyway. 

If this keeps up we will all just uninstall ASAP when we get a working version and 4get the whole deal.

I'm not gona uninstall something that leaves my OS files "patched" and not knowing what they are. And I ain't gona reinstall an older backup just for this silly thing when I've had a hell of a lot of updates and installs since I installed this thing.

I want this software to work and do what is say's and keep it, but its gettin a bit crazy waitin for a repair of such a small program.

So just what is the deal?, is this one gona be repaired 1.1, or is this just gona be replaced altogether with this other one?

This kinda stuff can lead to a lot of other trouble when a lot of people's systems are stuck in limbo over some piece of software, disclaimer's or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man look homes, we need a &#8220;fix&#8221; for this &#8220;vista&#8221; one right now, I&#8217;m not concerned about any Win7 version right now, win 7 is still in rc state. I have it installed on a second system partition but it pretty much looks and works like my vista anyway. </p>
<p>If this keeps up we will all just uninstall ASAP when we get a working version and 4get the whole deal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not gona uninstall something that leaves my OS files &#8220;patched&#8221; and not knowing what they are. And I ain&#8217;t gona reinstall an older backup just for this silly thing when I&#8217;ve had a hell of a lot of updates and installs since I installed this thing.</p>
<p>I want this software to work and do what is say&#8217;s and keep it, but its gettin a bit crazy waitin for a repair of such a small program.</p>
<p>So just what is the deal?, is this one gona be repaired 1.1, or is this just gona be replaced altogether with this other one?</p>
<p>This kinda stuff can lead to a lot of other trouble when a lot of people&#8217;s systems are stuck in limbo over some piece of software, disclaimer&#8217;s or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

